Excuse me, but my life is waiting.

Hiyee…

Im back from Bangkok. Will fill you guys up on the detail…but first, check out my pics! Just click on the link on the right.

Hi.

I’d just like to announce to everyone who actually drops by to read my rubbish, that me and Mr mimosa will be taking a 4 day hiatus to Bangkok this weekend…

Anyway, I just read Mr Mimosa’s post and decided that I had to chip in my two cents worth..Couldn’t very well let womenkind go undefended, can i?

First, in case there are those who have no idea what the Women’s Charter is, it is an Act that was passed in 1961 to provides the legal basis for equality between husband and wife. Basically, the essence of the act is as follows (pardon me for the cut and paste..I won’t deny that im just lazy):

• makes polygamy illegal;
• recognises the wife’s right to a different domicile (this means legal residence or home) from her husband;
• gives equal rights and duties to both husbands and wives in the management of the home and children;
• makes it obligatory for a husband to maintain his wife and children during marriage and after divorce;
• entitles the divorced man or wife to a share of matrimonial assets;
• enables a battered spouse to gain protection from the perpetrator;
• provides the punishment for offences against women and girls.

So, in fact…despite it’s misnomer, the Women’s Charter does protect the rights of men as well.

In my humble opinion, I really do not think that a Men’s Charter is needed at all at this point in time. As of now, the social, economic and corporate achievements of men far outweigh those of women. It is a known fact that equality between the sexes does not exist at the moment. I am also of the opinion that there will never be equality between in the sexes in the future, simply because of the way men and women are built. However, I do think that there will be equal opportunity in the future.

So while it is undeniable that men do get raped (unbelievable as it may seem), the number of women being accosted still far outnumbers the men. Moreover, given the current social status of women and the dominant position of men, the protection extended by this Act ensures that women are able to claim what is rightfully theirs. (This of course says nothing about women who abuse the system by calling wolf…but that’s another story for another day.)

Talking politics makes me tired…i guess i’ll continue this another…if i ever. Alternatively, someone could help me finish my tirade. Haha…

I’ll be going now…I’ll see u guys again in a few days. Cheerio!

First off, I have decided against calling myself god, good reason being I wouldn’t be considered as a deity and neither I would want to be associated with the dead.

From this very moment, I will thus be identified as THE MASTERPIECE.

Is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation?

Now let us air our views on the above mentioned topic. I was rather amused but left interested by the message name left by one of my friend on his MSN messenger.

Now, this friend of mine is married for 3 years till date (to of course, a beautiful and understanding lady) and it is questionable as to doubt him on his views on marriage whereas he could be as uncertain as I am.

This is indeed cynical to hear from someone who made sure his wedding vows followed him till death, be that death till us part. This is perhaps of a series of fateful events, I shall conclude that has led him to how he is feeling and thinking now.

Monogamy, there was indeed a topic and comments not too long ago on this blog. Let me throw in my $1 million dollar worth. What are the expectations that women generally look for when they choose suitable men for marriages? It is ascertain that most men (although not all) would eventually choose not to abide the rule of having just one partner (sexual too), with the intention of seeking “readdress” outside and somewhere else. It is also definite (or rather) to say that, even though he could be reassuring to you physically; that you would have presumed his soul and mind to be too. This kind of conceptualisation would only be of significance in the eyes of the foolish.

As the monopolisation of Skinapour is seen advancing through the “effectual” Pappies, more so we are to witness for ourselves the collapse ultimately of the monogamy structure. As men and women get exposed to more and more western ethics, cultures and values, it is therefore to anticipate that the polygamy will be in due course, the solution to an immoral society which has yet to surface fully.

As I can concur, marriages were once intended to protect women. It has rather, progressed to the current phase to witness the growing affluences of women and that they might stand side by side with men, asking for equalities and stipulations. So may I ask, why are men excluded (and not given a charter too? We could get raped too!)?

If this is so, surely the practice of egalitarianism should therefore be acknowledged. Men could cheat, women would too (only being more careful). It would only be fair if our society practices fairness in all, but sad to say, with the pappies in control, only the elites would fly that plane together when the country experiences dire consequences (as a result of losing its own identity, Singapore? More like the next upcoming state for America; “Singamericana”).

So why is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation? If you were to assume, when the practice of marriages would indefinitely involve deceive, “monopoly” but at the same time as women and men conveyed, the desire to hanker after “additional sustainability and reinforcement”; that if all fails, we sleep in a different room with another tonight.

This is ridiculous. I am for Monogamy. Why? I’ll tell you why next time. I love the person I am with concurrently so there is not a need to seek bearings with another. Why have noodles outside or bring them home when beef is cooked, ready and tasty at home.

Cheers

The Masterpiece

Hi.

I’d just like to announce to everyone who actually drops by to read my rubbish, that me and Mr mimosa will be taking a 4 day hiatus to Bangkok this weekend…

Anyway, I just read Mr Mimosa’s post and decided that I had to chip in my two cents worth..Couldn’t very well let womenkind go undefended, can i?

First, in case there are those who have no idea what the Women’s Charter is, it is an Act that was passed in 1961 to provides the legal basis for equality between husband and wife. Basically, the essence of the act is as follows (pardon me for the cut and paste..I won’t deny that im just lazy):

• makes polygamy illegal;
• recognises the wife’s right to a different domicile (this means legal residence or home) from her husband;
• gives equal rights and duties to both husbands and wives in the management of the home and children;
• makes it obligatory for a husband to maintain his wife and children during marriage and after divorce;
• entitles the divorced man or wife to a share of matrimonial assets;
• enables a battered spouse to gain protection from the perpetrator;
• provides the punishment for offences against women and girls.

So, in fact…despite it’s misnomer, the Women’s Charter does protect the rights of men as well.

In my humble opinion, I really do not think that a Men’s Charter is needed at all at this point in time. As of now, the social, economic and corporate achievements of men far outweigh those of women. It is a known fact that equality between the sexes does not exist at the moment. I am also of the opinion that there will never be equality between in the sexes in the future, simply because of the way men and women are built. However, I do think that there will be equal opportunity in the future.

So while it is undeniable that men do get raped (unbelievable as it may seem), the number of women being accosted still far outnumbers the men. Moreover, given the current social status of women and the dominant position of men, the protection extended by this Act ensures that women are able to claim what is rightfully theirs. (This of course says nothing about women who abuse the system by calling wolf…but that’s another story for another day.)

Talking politics makes me tired…i guess i’ll continue this another…if i ever. Alternatively, someone could help me finish my tirade. Haha…

I’ll be going now…I’ll see u guys again in a few days. Cheerio!

First off, I have decided against calling myself god, good reason being I wouldn’t be considered as a deity and neither I would want to be associated with the dead.

From this very moment, I will thus be identified as THE MASTERPIECE.

Is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation?

Now let us air our views on the above mentioned topic. I was rather amused but left interested by the message name left by one of my friend on his MSN messenger.

Now, this friend of mine is married for 3 years till date (to of course, a beautiful and understanding lady) and it is questionable as to doubt him on his views on marriage whereas he could be as uncertain as I am.

This is indeed cynical to hear from someone who made sure his wedding vows followed him till death, be that death till us part. This is perhaps of a series of fateful events, I shall conclude that has led him to how he is feeling and thinking now.

Monogamy, there was indeed a topic and comments not too long ago on this blog. Let me throw in my $1 million dollar worth. What are the expectations that women generally look for when they choose suitable men for marriages? It is ascertain that most men (although not all) would eventually choose not to abide the rule of having just one partner (sexual too), with the intention of seeking “readdress” outside and somewhere else. It is also definite (or rather) to say that, even though he could be reassuring to you physically; that you would have presumed his soul and mind to be too. This kind of conceptualisation would only be of significance in the eyes of the foolish.

As the monopolisation of Skinapour is seen advancing through the “effectual” Pappies, more so we are to witness for ourselves the collapse ultimately of the monogamy structure. As men and women get exposed to more and more western ethics, cultures and values, it is therefore to anticipate that the polygamy will be in due course, the solution to an immoral society which has yet to surface fully.

As I can concur, marriages were once intended to protect women. It has rather, progressed to the current phase to witness the growing affluences of women and that they might stand side by side with men, asking for equalities and stipulations. So may I ask, why are men excluded (and not given a charter too? We could get raped too!)?

If this is so, surely the practice of egalitarianism should therefore be acknowledged. Men could cheat, women would too (only being more careful). It would only be fair if our society practices fairness in all, but sad to say, with the pappies in control, only the elites would fly that plane together when the country experiences dire consequences (as a result of losing its own identity, Singapore? More like the next upcoming state for America; “Singamericana”).

So why is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation? If you were to assume, when the practice of marriages would indefinitely involve deceive, “monopoly” but at the same time as women and men conveyed, the desire to hanker after “additional sustainability and reinforcement”; that if all fails, we sleep in a different room with another tonight.

This is ridiculous. I am for Monogamy. Why? I’ll tell you why next time. I love the person I am with concurrently so there is not a need to seek bearings with another. Why have noodles outside or bring them home when beef is cooked, ready and tasty at home.

Cheers

The Masterpiece

Hi all and sundry,

I realise that mr mimosa is not as welcomed here as i hoped he would be. Ah well, to each his own i guess.

I’d like to reiterate that i do not take any responsiblity for anything he says (although i can apologise on his behalf)and we are separate entities…but the thing is, he’s my bf and he’s here to stay on my blog.

I know some of his posts are quite offensive…but i cannot control what he writes or how he thinks. Neither will i boot him off my blog because blogging is all about freedom of expression and he’s here to stay until he’s ready to start his own or when he tires of blogging. Whichever one comes first.

So please, try be patient or skip reading altogether. I guess you could say im sitting on the fence but seriously, what’s a girl to do?

As for what i want, i guess time will only tell whether we will be together forever. Sounds cliche, but until he proves otherwise, he’s here to stay.

Hi all and sundry,

I realise that mr mimosa is not as welcomed here as i hoped he would be. Ah well, to each his own i guess.

I’d like to reiterate that i do not take any responsiblity for anything he says (although i can apologise on his behalf)and we are separate entities…but the thing is, he’s my bf and he’s here to stay on my blog.

I know some of his posts are quite offensive…but i cannot control what he writes or how he thinks. Neither will i boot him off my blog because blogging is all about freedom of expression and he’s here to stay until he’s ready to start his own or when he tires of blogging. Whichever one comes first.

So please, try be patient or skip reading altogether. I guess you could say im sitting on the fence but seriously, what’s a girl to do?

As for what i want, i guess time will only tell whether we will be together forever. Sounds cliche, but until he proves otherwise, he’s here to stay.

The time has come again for the god to blog…

Mr_Mimosa aka God of Bloggers
(Remember no matter what, peasants belonged to somebody)

The time has come again for the god to blog…

Mr_Mimosa aka God of Bloggers
(Remember no matter what, peasants belonged to somebody)

As you ppl can see, i have reverted my blog interface back to its default of, what mr mimosa calls, gay lime green. Well..the html shit just didn’t work for me so until i figure out how to do it, my site is going to stay gay.

I also decided that working 12 days straight does not exactly agree with my body. I get depressed toward the end. Yes, I do occasionally get depressed. It’s not easy for me to stay depressed though because i consider being depressed a form of self-torture. If you can psych yourself out of a cranky mood, why not? Why stay unhappy (and make the rest of the ppl who are with you suffer as well) when you can play some mind-games with yourself and instantly feel better?

I think i sometimes play too many mind-games with myself for my own good. Sometimes, i think some people should just be given a good hiding. Sometimes, I want to just slap certain assholes and dickheads across the face. I just want to laugh in the face of the pompous and obnoxious just to show them how ridiculous they are. Sometimes, I just feel like telling every single person to F off. But most of the time, i just play along. Why? Life’s easier this way. I guess the only problem is that occasionally, you feel as if you are being walked all over just like a freaking doormat.

I just can’t understand why some people go all out to prove to others that they are right..and that others are wrong. Who cares?

My philosophy is, just do it. Then find some sneaky way to side-track and get what you want. Who cares what the means is if u can get to the end?

In anycase, I’d like to apologise for sounding so cynical and cranky…because that’s exactly how im feeling right now. And FYI, it’s not pms. This is just how missbeh is when she’s in a bad mood.